Huntington Hoops



National Computer
System Ratings

MCC Conference
DakStats Page		     MCC Conference Charts and Stats
         
 

MCC Charts and Stats. . .
  •   Select a link for charts and tables of comparative MCC team information.
 
Statistical Charts:  
Points per Possession
Points per Game
Field Goal Percentage
Three-Point Percentage
Free Throw Percentage
Assists per Field Goal
Assists per Game
Rebounds per Opportunity
Rebounds per Game
Blocks per Game
Steals per Game
Turnovers per Possession
Turnovers per Game
Assist/Turnover Ratio
 
Comparative Tables:  
RPI Calculations
Strength of Schedule
Computer System Ratings
Success Over 10 Years
  •   Select a link for two-dimensional graphs of comparative stats (updated weekly).
 
Team Effectiveness:  
Offense and Defense Points per Possession
Offense and Defense Rebounding Efficiency
Assist Percentage vs Turnover Percentage
  Home versus Away:   Field Goal and Three-Point Percentages
Free Throw and Called Foul Advantage
  •   Comparative MCC team stats are shown below.  NAIA Rankings may not include all games (occurs when the school's SID has not posted games on the DaksStats site).
  2007-08 MCC Conference Team Statistics and Rankings
MCC Team data as of 3/15/08   -   NAIA Ranking as of 3/15/08 (286 of 286 games)
Team Gms Pts/G MCC NAIA Opp/G MCC NAIA P Mar MCC NAIA 3P/G MCC NAIA Ast/G MCC NAIA
Bethel 36 82.6 # 1 # 16 66.5 # 3 # 35 +16.1 # 1 # 6 5.5 # 8 19.6 # 1 # 3
Goshen 31 75.7 # 3 72.6 # 8 +3.2 # 6 7.1 # 4 12.5 # 8
Grace 36 74.5 # 4 68.2 # 6 # 29 +6.3 # 4 5.6 # 7 16.3 # 2 # 28
Huntington 32 77.3 # 2 71.5 # 7 +5.8 # 5 6.3 # 6 15.9 # 3 # 33
Ind Wesley 30 71.2 # 6 62.3 # 2 # 7 +8.9 # 3 # 25 7.8 # 1 # 38 12.6 # 7
Marian 27 64.5 # 8 67.4 # 4 # 24 -2.9 # 8 7.0 # 5 11.9 # 9
Spr Arbor 31 70.6 # 7 68.1 # 5 # 28 +2.5 # 7 7.5 # 2 13.2 # 6
St Francis 31 72.3 # 5 75.3 # 9 -3.0 # 9 5.3 # 9 15.3 # 4
Taylor 32 64.0 # 9 54.7 # 1 # 2 +9.3 # 2 # 22 7.2 # 3 13.4 # 5
Team Gms FG Pct MCC NAIA 3P Pct MCC NAIA FT Pct MCC NAIA T Mar MCC NAIA A/TO MCC NAIA
Bethel 36 51.9% # 1 # 2 34.9% # 6 71.1% # 5 # 33 -0.3 # 7 1.29 # 1 # 8
Goshen 31 44.0% # 8 35.1% # 5 73.7% # 3 # 10 -1.8 # 3 # 30 0.94 # 6
Grace 36 46.5% # 4 # 39 34.6% # 8 70.1% # 7 -1.7 # 4 # 25 1.05 # 4 # 33
Huntington 32 47.0% # 3 # 29 36.4% # 4 77.1% # 1 # 1 -1.1 # 6 1.18 # 3 # 18
Ind Wesley 30 46.1% # 5 39.1% # 2 # 18 67.5% # 8 -2.7 # 1 # 21 0.95 # 5
Marian 27 41.1% # 9 34.9% # 6 65.7% # 9 -1.9 # 2 # 27 0.78 # 9
Spr Arbor 31 45.2% # 6 39.4% # 1 # 17 73.8% # 2 # 7 -0.3 # 7 0.85 # 8
St Francis 31 44.4% # 7 31.4% # 9 70.5% # 6 +0.6 # 9 0.90 # 7
Taylor 32 47.2% # 2 # 27 38.0% # 3 # 28 73.6% # 4 # 12 -1.4 # 5 # 40 1.21 # 2 # 12
Team Gms DR/G MCC NAIA TR/G MCC NAIA R Mar MCC NAIA Blk/G MCC NAIA Stl/G MCC NAIA
Bethel 36 27.8 # 1 # 12 39.6 # 1 # 16 +9.6 # 1 # 2 3.9 # 2 # 17 7.9 # 4
Goshen 31 22.9 # 7 34.5 # 5 +0.9 # 4 2.9 # 5 7.1 # 6
Grace 36 24.3 # 4 36.2 # 3 +3.1 # 2 4.1 # 1 # 13 9.5 # 1 # 23
Huntington 32 25.4 # 2 34.7 # 4 -1.0 # 8 2.8 # 6 6.2 # 8
Ind Wesley 30 24.8 # 3 33.9 # 6 -0.7 # 7 3.0 # 4 6.8 # 7
Marian 27 21.4 # 9 31.5 # 8 -4.9 # 9 2.3 # 9 9.0 # 3 # 34
Spr Arbor 31 23.2 # 6 33.2 # 7 +0.5 # 6 3.1 # 3 7.3 # 5
St Francis 31 23.7 # 5 36.3 # 2 +1.2 # 3 2.7 # 7 9.2 # 2 # 28
Taylor 32 22.7 # 8 29.7 # 9 +0.7 # 5 2.6 # 8 6.2 # 8
Team Gms P/OP MCC P/DP MCC OR% MCC DR% MCC TO% MCC
Bethel 36 1.13 # 1 0.93 # 3 37% # 1 74% # 1 21% # 5
Goshen 31 1.06 # 4 1.02 # 8 33% # 4 69% # 5 19% # 1
Grace 36 1.04 # 6 0.95 # 4 35% # 2 70% # 4 22% # 6
Huntington 32 1.07 # 3 1.00 # 7 28% # 7 68% # 8 19% # 2
Ind Wesley 30 1.04 # 5 0.91 # 1 27% # 8 71% # 3 19% # 4
Marian 27 0.93 # 9 0.98 # 6 28% # 6 67% # 9 22% # 7
Spr Arbor 31 1.02 # 7 0.97 # 5 31% # 5 69% # 6 23% # 8
St Francis 31 0.98 # 8 1.02 # 9 34% # 3 69% # 7 23% # 9
Taylor 32 1.07 # 2 0.92 # 2 26% # 9 73% # 2 19% # 2
Key:  Pts/G - Points Scored per Game OR/G - Offensive Rebounds per Game
Opp/G - Points Allowed per Game TR/G - Total Rebounds per Game
P Mar - Average Points Margin R Mar - Average Rebound Margin
3P/G - Three-Point FGs per Game Blk/G - Blocks per Game
Ast/G - Assists per Game Stl/G - Steals per Game
FG Pct - Overall Field Goal Percentage P/OP - Points Scored per Offensive Possession
3P Pct - Three-Point FG Percentage P/DP - Points Allowed per Opponents Possession
FT Pct - Free Throw Percentage OR% - Offensive Rebounds as a Percent of Missed Shots
T Mar - Average Turnover Margin DR% - Defensive Rebounds as a Percent of Opponents Missed Shots
A/TO - Assist to Turnover Ratio TO% - Turnovers as a Percent of Offensive Possessions


Paul Harrington, Fort Wayne, IN